The historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth is both long-established and widespread. My question then, is, does anyone know of any actual historical evidence for the existence of Jesus?
Within a few decades of his supposed lifetime, he is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians, as well as by dozens of Christian writings. Thallus unknown lifespan, claimed to be active in 2nd century CE: Problems[ edit ] There are two main problems with Primary Biblical and Christian evidence: But all that still does not entail the mythicists are right, any more then the similar failing of the mythists entail they are wrong.
I would say, however, if you are going to read up on it pick a real historian - say N. Remsberg, in fact, stated "it is not against the man Jesus that I write, but against the Christ Jesus of theology" and felt there was just enough evidence to show that the Triumphalist-Jesus of Bethlehem was a historical myth on "a real event distorted and numberless legends attached until but a small residuum of truth remains and the narrative is essentially false" side of that definition.
In his Annals ca. Yet there is virtually zero historical evidence of his supposed existence in any contemporary historical record. Little in the four canonical gospels is considered to be historically reliable.
There are one or two extremists, but the weight of historical scholarship agrees that Jesus of Nazareth really did live and preach in that period and was crucified for his troubles.
These written accounts are known as the Gospels. The only reason we know it did NOT talk about Christianity at all is because Augustine in the 4th century complained about it. About 20 years after Josephus we have the Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus, who held some of the highest offices of state at the beginning of the second century AD.
The Testamonium Flavium account is so thoroughly refuted, that biblical scholars since the 19th century have refused to refer to it, unless to mention its false nature. It is also important to understand that an absolute reign of terror was instituted when Christianity seized power in the Roman Empire as documented in our Christian Totalitarianism Report.
However, as documented by Gerald Massey, Christians themselves have claimed that this is actually a disciple of Jehoshua Ben-Perachia who lived at least a century before the alleged Christian Jesus. Historians often study the historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles when studying the reliability of the gospels, as the Book of Acts was seemingly written by the same author as the Gospel of Luke.
Jesus was on the side of the poor and exploited.
This work, however, was not preserved by the Christians. Pliny the Younger, in Letters First, no work of the New Testament with dates older than those below have definitively been identified as being part of those finds. Judea Province during the 1st century All extant sources that mention Jesus were written after his death.
Flavius Josephus is the most famous Jewish historian. The most successful of these "tricksters" appears to be "the Egyptian" who led a flock of 30, believers around Palestine Jewish War, 2. There are no contemporary or near-contemporary pagan accounts of any of the events in the life or death of Jesus including the earthquake in Jerusalem, at the time of the Passover, c.
Compare that with, for example, King Arthur, who supposedly lived around AD If you want to see just how bad Christ Mythism can get and want to kill a few brain cells in the bargain watch Zeitgeist ; everything in that thing is wrong and is the poster child of bad Christ Myth.
The Roman Historian, Pliny The Younger CEwrote a letter to the Emperor Trajan in CE requesting his assistance in the proper punishment of a group of "Christiani" who were causing trouble and would not bow to the image of the emperor.
Because of the way cultures have told their religious and mythic stories over time, and based in no small part on studies of modern "new" religions especially cult religions and how they deify their own leaders,  most scholars of Biblical history believe that the gospels of the Bible are sufficient evidence to say that Jesus, or some human seed for the stories who we may as well tag "Jesus", did exist, and his existence can be assumed from them.
This is my understanding of the situation after a fair amount of reading on the subject. Romans, 1st Corinthians, 2nd Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1st Thessalonians and Philemon one must keep the concept of provenance the place of origin or earliest known history of something in mind.
It is hard to find historians who regard this material as serious archaeological data, however. None of it can be shown to independently corroborate the Gospels as to the historicity of Jesus.
And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples.Apr 30, · Is there any historical evidence for the existence of Jesus? My question then, is, does anyone know of any actual historical evidence for the existence of Jesus? Apr 29, We teamed is generally agreed to be a forgery.
The other, the mention of "Jesus, known as the Christ" as the brother of James the Just, is considered by some to. The historicity of Jesus concerns the degree to which sources show Jesus of Nazareth existed as a Richard Carrier and Raphael Lataster assert that there is no independent evidence of Jesus’s existence outside the New Testament.
Chronology of Jesus; Historical background of the New Testament; Historicity of the Bible. The time that Jesus Christ supposedly existed is one the most heavily documented periods in ancient history. Yet there is virtually zero historical evidence of his supposed existence in any contemporary historical record.
What is the historical evidence that Jesus Christ lived and died? Today some claim that Jesus is just an idea, rather than a real historical figure, but there is a good deal of written evidence.
Question: "Did Jesus really exist? Is there any historical evidence of Jesus Christ?" Answer: Typically, when this question is asked, the person asking qualifies the question with “outside of the Bible.” We do not grant this idea that the Bible cannot be considered a source of evidence for the existence of Jesus.
THE MAN CHRIST JESUS.
Did Jesus of Nazareth exist as a real human being? Outside of the New Testament, what is the evidence for his existence?Download